Moderator: Morg
I Love Italy wrote:Shouldn't OSL have a North and South coast?
marsman57 wrote:Not that the map would've changed in any way but Kur should've focused on West Bank as well.
I Love Italy wrote:Shouldn't OSL have a North and South coast?
EpicDim wrote:The victory condition for a solo remains one more than half of all remaining supply centers.
The victory condition was half or more of all remaining SCs. Are you changing that now, or should this rule stay the same?
EpicDim wrote:Also, D in Gda should be in Lit.
EpicDim wrote:A border change may never result in either the elimination of a player
How do you define this? If it would eliminate the player's last SC but they still have a unit it would be ok? If it would eliminate their last unit but they still had an SC and they couldn't build it would still be ok?
EpicDim wrote:On the merger of a sea and a land space, if a fleet and an army were present, the fleet remains on the space and the army may retreat if possible. If two fleets were present, both must retreat if possible. If a fleet becomes landlocked, it may retreat to an adjacent province with a coast if possible.
What about ducks?
EpicDim wrote:Possession is only defined for unoccupied territories or two SCs. I think you need some rules for possession when one or both of the territories are occupied and/or neither is an SC.
You also have a contradiction here:If two unoccupied territories are merged, the resulting territory remains neutral, unless one was an owned but unoccupied SC, or both were owned by the same power. Then the owner of the SC(s) continues to own the new territory as an SC.
A territory formed by merging two SCs becomes neutral unless one was already neutral in which case the power with control of the other retains control.
If two unoccupied SCs owned by the same player are merged. Rule one states the owner keeps the combined one. The second rule states that it becomes neutral.
EpicDim wrote:What happens if there are two units in one of the spaces being merged because one is dislodged and the other is the new occupier? For instance, if an army dislodges a fleet in an SC and that space is merged into a sea space, who gets to stay? Or if the same situation happens and the land space is merged into a sea space?
EpicDim wrote:What about mergers into nuked territories?
How are home SCs and capitals handled? Do they only remain with those designations if the name remains the same?
Same question for the non SC build locations.
Same question for religion SCs.
What if a nation loses all of their home SCs? Are they just SOL for builds?
Two zombies merge, what happens? Does one of them retreat, if so how does that work?
EpicDim wrote:Hopefully the last question. This is the Fall rule, but it seems as if it's retroactively affecting the Spring result. Since it occurs between movement and retreats, but this one is occurring after retreats it seems like there is a problem. Would there have been a second retreat phase?
Also, D in Gda should be in Lit....Fixed
ducks will always retreat to either armies or fleets
And who cares about possession of non-SC...doesn't matter. And the retreat hierarchy deals with the occupied issue...whoever stays "owns" it.
Vanishing borders will happen after retreats
After each movement phase but before the retreat phase a randomly chosen border is erased. The victory condition for a solo remains one more than half of all remaining supply centers.
A nation will not lose all of their home SCs
marsman57 wrote:A nation will not lose all of their home SCs
Theoretically this could happen with a very bad chain reaction of black hole expansion, but I rate it statistically unlikely.
EpicDim wrote:Also, D in Gda should be in Lit....Fixed
Not fixed on the map here.
ducks will always retreat to either armies or fleets
So just to clarify, Ducks will always retreat to A or F, but A only retreats to F if a sea space merges with a land space, otherwise both retreat.
And who cares about possession of non-SC...doesn't matter. And the retreat hierarchy deals with the occupied issue...whoever stays "owns" it.
LOTSS cares about possession of non-SCs and it definitely DOES matter.
Unit placement does not deal with possession. If after a Spring move A merges into B and A is owned by England, B is owned by Russia but contains a French Fleet, are you saying that France automatically gains control of the space? And is your answer the same if England owned both A & B?
And if that is true, then America owns Osl because they "stayed".
Vanishing borders will happen after retreats
After each movement phase but before the retreat phase a randomly chosen border is erased. The victory condition for a solo remains one more than half of all remaining supply centers.
So is that an official change to the rule? Will that mean a second retreat phase after the border vanishes?
And some new questions:
Merging a space with a unit (or zombie) into a Black Hole will do what to the unit/zombie?
Same question for a radioactive space.
Same answer
So if a religious space merges out of existence, will the neutral army remain?
And if a neutral army is required to retreat from a zombie or other unit, how does that work?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests