You should reward with cake.... or home brew.
Who the hell wants a rubber?
Rematch.
super_dipsy wrote:To me, 'best' player takes into account results AND committment. To me, I would never give the award to someone in my team who has only played 2 out of every 3 games. It's fine to turn up when you feel like it and win every game, but that is not a 'player of the year' to me.
NoPunIn10Did wrote:super_dipsy wrote:To me, 'best' player takes into account results AND committment. To me, I would never give the award to someone in my team who has only played 2 out of every 3 games. It's fine to turn up when you feel like it and win every game, but that is not a 'player of the year' to me.
Per joe’s original post, the missed games were pre-approved and for family commitments. For an amateur/community sports league, that’s par for the course.
Woolgie wrote:Award say 0.5 wins for a missed rubber.
That would put both on 29 and you can call it a draw.
0.5 is a little arbitrary, but if you award 0.48 for a missed rubber (I.e. half of Rob’s win rate) that would give the win to Matt.
You should definitely award something for a missed game. Our main client does this at work to balance the scores amongst suppliers. But the rate is up to you.
Woolgie wrote:Award say 0.5 wins for a missed rubber.
That would put both on 29 and you can call it a draw.
0.5 is a little arbitrary, but if you award 0.48 for a missed rubber (I.e. half of Rob’s win rate) that would give the win to Matt.
You should definitely award something for a missed game. Our main client does this at work to balance the scores amongst suppliers. But the rate is up to you.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests