Proposal 309 - Collector’s Edition

Moderators: Crunkus, connect4

Re: Proposal 309 - Collector’s Edition

Postby Crunkus » 19 Mar 2014, 21:41

Is see pjk's observation about Draco's Law as valid. I did not notice that.

I see no reason to NAY the rule itself. Perhaps Pagane or someone else will design a better version of Draco's Law another time.

AYE
NAY
(sigh)
Crunkus
 
Posts: 17650
Joined: 05 Feb 2009, 23:51
Class: Star Ambassador
All-game rating: (944)
Timezone: GMT-5

Re: Proposal 309 - Collector’s Edition

Postby Pagane » 20 Mar 2014, 04:12

pjkon wrote:NAY
NAY

My reason for voting NAY on these two proposals is as follows: The Draco's Law would actually bring about a 213 ending, assuming that the possessor of Draco's Law actually tried to use it, which he would since I would get Draco's Law by virtue of being the most recent player, since the number of votes to allow for thing creation is unspecified, so the creation of a thing would be equally legal and illegal. Since it would be my turn next turn when this occurred I would win, but this would be an incredibly boring end to the game. I also doubt that you all will miss this long enough for me to win with it, so resistance is futile.

As to the rule, without Draco's law we will never get to the point where we can actually use the rule, due to lack of sufficient things, so there is no point in voting aye.

Yay, I'm active.


That was an oversight on my part. I was more concerned with creating Collections than Draco's Law, so I hastily threw together a Thing to create more Things. Draco's Law isn't ready to be created, though if someone wants to clean it up or to propose a similar Thing I'd likely vote AYE for it.

The rule itself, however, could be a very interesting mechanic. The struggle to control Complete Collections will have an exciting effect on gameplay and create another focus for player alliances. It also incentivizes the more rapid creation of Things(through Things akin to Draco's Law) to make more complete-able Collections.

AYE


Welcome to the game, mate! Sincerely, good to have you. Hope you like dark, earthy reds!
Pours a glass of Tannat and slides it over to Pjkon.
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.

Previously known as Santiago Matamoros.
User avatar
Pagane
 
Posts: 596
Joined: 04 Nov 2013, 01:59
Location: Wine Country, Virginia
Class: Ambassador
Standard rating: (1079)
All-game rating: (1085)
Timezone: GMT

Re: Proposal 309 - Collector’s Edition

Postby pjkon » 20 Mar 2014, 14:04

UNDER 10 midi-chlorians

Posted from my phone. Will post in more detail later, but don't want to miss deadline.
It is better to have scs then allies, assuming something aproaching equal combat power in each

Your credibility with eliminated powers is irrelavant

Keep your allies happy enough that they stay allies

If you are receiving a message from me ignore this signature
pjkon
 
Posts: 375
Joined: 06 Feb 2012, 22:05
Class: Diplomat
All-game rating: (1000)
Timezone: GMT-5

Re: Proposal 309 - Collector’s Edition

Postby pjkon » 20 Mar 2014, 16:04

UNDER 10 midi-chlorians

I edited the last post to increase font size, but upon re-reading of the rules I realized that this might be construed as fizzing, thereby rendering all command content void. Hence I am reposting here.

Pagane wrote:

Welcome to the game, mate! Sincerely, good to have you. Hope you like dark, earthy reds!
Pours a glass of Tannat and slides it over to Pjkon.


Thank you! I look forward to playing a very enjoyable game of...whatever we want it to be I guess... :) with you.
It is better to have scs then allies, assuming something aproaching equal combat power in each

Your credibility with eliminated powers is irrelavant

Keep your allies happy enough that they stay allies

If you are receiving a message from me ignore this signature
pjkon
 
Posts: 375
Joined: 06 Feb 2012, 22:05
Class: Diplomat
All-game rating: (1000)
Timezone: GMT-5

Re: Proposal 309 - Collector’s Edition

Postby Crunkus » 20 Mar 2014, 16:34

[size=150]OVER 10 midi-chlorians
(sigh)
Crunkus
 
Posts: 17650
Joined: 05 Feb 2009, 23:51
Class: Star Ambassador
All-game rating: (944)
Timezone: GMT-5

Re: Proposal 309 - Collector’s Edition

Postby Crunkus » 20 Mar 2014, 16:34

OVER 10 midi-chlorians
(sigh)
Crunkus
 
Posts: 17650
Joined: 05 Feb 2009, 23:51
Class: Star Ambassador
All-game rating: (944)
Timezone: GMT-5

Re: Proposal 309 - Collector’s Edition

Postby Pagane » 20 Mar 2014, 17:41

OVER 10 midi-chlorians

This could start Dipsy and Pjkon competing to become the Dark Lord of the Sith..
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.

Previously known as Santiago Matamoros.
User avatar
Pagane
 
Posts: 596
Joined: 04 Nov 2013, 01:59
Location: Wine Country, Virginia
Class: Ambassador
Standard rating: (1079)
All-game rating: (1085)
Timezone: GMT

Re: Proposal 309 - Collector’s Edition

Postby super_dipsy » 20 Mar 2014, 18:06

Pagane wrote:This could start Dipsy and Pjkon competing to become the Dark Lord of the Sith..

No, you have just nullified my possibilities :( . Unless I can get some of the AYEs to switch to NAYs...
User avatar
super_dipsy
Premium Member
 
Posts: 12068
Joined: 04 Nov 2009, 17:43
Class: Ambassador
Standard rating: 1000
All-game rating: 931
Timezone: GMT

Re: Proposal 309 - Collector’s Edition

Postby super_dipsy » 20 Mar 2014, 18:07

Oh, scatch that. I didn't see Pagan's post!

Now I feel better.
User avatar
super_dipsy
Premium Member
 
Posts: 12068
Joined: 04 Nov 2009, 17:43
Class: Ambassador
Standard rating: 1000
All-game rating: 931
Timezone: GMT

Re: Proposal 309 - Collector’s Edition

Postby super_dipsy » 20 Mar 2014, 18:08

Oh dear. Engage brain for heavens sake :oops:

I mean, I didn't see that combination of Crunkus and Pagane going over.
User avatar
super_dipsy
Premium Member
 
Posts: 12068
Joined: 04 Nov 2009, 17:43
Class: Ambassador
Standard rating: 1000
All-game rating: 931
Timezone: GMT

PreviousNext

Return to Nomic 5 (finished)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest