Re: Nomic 5 - Proposal 301
Posted:
13 Feb 2014, 19:04by connect4
Crunkus wrote:C4... how hard would it be to line up vote recognition with the tabulator recognition protocols...so that it could be used for convenience without being potentially deceptive?
https://script.google.com/macros/s/AKfy ... OHAm9/execI believe I've mostly got it working. There's a possible bug I may have found, but as long as there aren't exactly 10 posts in an hour we should be OK... (and if that happens, then it should fix itself after the next post).
Re: Nomic 5 - Proposal 301
Posted:
14 Feb 2014, 02:02by connect4
As there seem to be no further objections, let us open voting.
AYE
Re: Nomic 5 - Proposal 301
Posted:
14 Feb 2014, 02:12by connect4
Also, as an aside, dipsy would you care to sticky the other threads in this forum, so tabulator, scoreboard and rule list are easily found?
Re: Nomic 5 - Proposal 301
Posted:
14 Feb 2014, 03:53by connect4
numberwang1 wrote:NAY
Care to explain the reason for your vote?
Re: Nomic 5 - Proposal 301
Posted:
14 Feb 2014, 03:56by Pagane
AYEnumberwang1 wrote:NAY
What are your objections?
Re: Nomic 5 - Proposal 301
Posted:
14 Feb 2014, 05:14by numberwang1
Misunderstood rules 203/4, thought voting no when a rule passed was worth points all the time!
Re: Nomic 5 - Proposal 301
Posted:
14 Feb 2014, 05:21by connect4
numberwang1 wrote:Misunderstood rules 203/4, thought voting no when a rule passed was worth points all the time!
Nothing says you can't change your vote.