Page 2 of 4

Re: 34 Player Chaos

PostPosted: 02 May 2016, 20:30
by Don Juan of Austria
I think 34 would be really neat, but 17 would definitely be more doable.

Re: 34 Player Chaos

PostPosted: 02 May 2016, 20:35
by FrankC
You people are some serious masochists. I mean that in a nice way.

Re: 34 Player Chaos

PostPosted: 02 May 2016, 20:53
by condude1
Nice to have you on board Frank! ;)

Re: 34 Player Chaos

PostPosted: 02 May 2016, 21:04
by Don Juan of Austria
Yes, Dip needs more likeminded people! :lol:

Re: 34 Player Chaos

PostPosted: 02 May 2016, 21:09
by EpicDim
I would GM or Play if there is enough interest.

Re: 34 Player Chaos

PostPosted: 02 May 2016, 21:15
by Don Juan of Austria
Right! We currently have:

Malevolence
joe92
Don Juan of Austria
I Love Italy
UsernamePending
condude1
irvin
Woolgie
And maybe FrankC and Ghostecho.

Which would put us at 10, over half way to 17...and a ways to go for 34. :)

Re: 34 Player Chaos

PostPosted: 02 May 2016, 21:27
by Woolgie
I will definitely play this.

Re: 34 Player Chaos

PostPosted: 02 May 2016, 22:21
by EnlightenedMonarch
I'm interested, but I would prefer 2 SC's each

Re: 34 Player Chaos

PostPosted: 03 May 2016, 00:58
by I Love Italy
Yeah, I think 17 players would be more doable, with two centers randomly alloted to each player.

Re: 34 Player Chaos

PostPosted: 03 May 2016, 01:04
by condude1
I Love Italy wrote:Yeah, I think 17 players would be more doable, with two centers randomly alloted to each player.


I wouldn't recommend randomly. It's too swingy that way. For example, if I get Ankara and Smyrna, I'm guaranteed a very good start, whereas St. Petersburg and Naples... Not so much.