Climate Change

A forum to seperate the more serious discussions from the lighter topics in Off-topic.

Re: Climate Change

Postby Strategus » 26 Aug 2019, 21:24

DavidMaletsky wrote:Plastics have been on the planet less than two centuries. Yet there is a swirling mass of them in the Pacific larger than Mexico; they have increasingly been discovered in the guts of sea life; microplastics have been discovered in both our food supply, and raining from the sky.

Also, if a loved one were to pass away, by your reasoning that would also be insignificant. In other words, time indices are not a necessary component of significance.

Everything you say is true except the last bit. Of course time indices are an indication of significance,
The Devil makes work for idle forces

Better to have fought and lost, than never to have fought at all
Actual Platinum Classicist
I did WDC 2017

Just say "NO!" To carebears and kittens
User avatar
Strategus
 
Posts: 1861
Joined: 30 May 2015, 14:30
Location: England
Class: Star Ambassador
Standard rating: 1583
All-game rating: 1708
Timezone: GMT

Re: Climate Change

Postby DavidMaletsky » 26 Aug 2019, 21:54

If time indices are a necessary semantic component of significance, then why can both an occurrence in a single moment, and one over millions of years, both be sensibly described as significant? Further, why can significance be sensibly used in atemporal statements? “the unit concept is significant to the negation concept”
DavidMaletsky
 
Posts: 64
Joined: 11 Jun 2018, 19:05

Re: Climate Change

Postby Strategus » 26 Aug 2019, 21:55

Blah blah blah. Speak English.
The Devil makes work for idle forces

Better to have fought and lost, than never to have fought at all
Actual Platinum Classicist
I did WDC 2017

Just say "NO!" To carebears and kittens
User avatar
Strategus
 
Posts: 1861
Joined: 30 May 2015, 14:30
Location: England
Class: Star Ambassador
Standard rating: 1583
All-game rating: 1708
Timezone: GMT

Re: Climate Change

Postby DavidMaletsky » 26 Aug 2019, 22:02

All I used were English terms; and by the miracle of technology, English dictionaries are readily available online!

I am speaking English; maybe you should learn it
DavidMaletsky
 
Posts: 64
Joined: 11 Jun 2018, 19:05

Re: Climate Change

Postby Strategus » 26 Aug 2019, 22:05

Maybe you should stop talking bollocks.
The Devil makes work for idle forces

Better to have fought and lost, than never to have fought at all
Actual Platinum Classicist
I did WDC 2017

Just say "NO!" To carebears and kittens
User avatar
Strategus
 
Posts: 1861
Joined: 30 May 2015, 14:30
Location: England
Class: Star Ambassador
Standard rating: 1583
All-game rating: 1708
Timezone: GMT

Re: Climate Change

Postby DavidMaletsky » 26 Aug 2019, 22:26

Yes, clearly agreeing with the global scientific community over a span north of forty years = “talking bollocks”. My bad.
DavidMaletsky
 
Posts: 64
Joined: 11 Jun 2018, 19:05

Re: Climate Change

Postby Strategus » 26 Aug 2019, 22:54

DavidMaletsky wrote:Yes, clearly agreeing with the global scientific community over a span north of forty years = “talking bollocks”. My bad.

Too right
The Devil makes work for idle forces

Better to have fought and lost, than never to have fought at all
Actual Platinum Classicist
I did WDC 2017

Just say "NO!" To carebears and kittens
User avatar
Strategus
 
Posts: 1861
Joined: 30 May 2015, 14:30
Location: England
Class: Star Ambassador
Standard rating: 1583
All-game rating: 1708
Timezone: GMT

Re: Climate Change

Postby The O » 26 Aug 2019, 23:08

Let's rewind a bit here.
There are 3 potential truths about climate change (oh heck.. I'm going to go ahead and call it global warming):

1) Global warming is not happening
2) Global warming is happening but it is a natural geological process
3) Global warming is happening and it is primarily driven by human activity.

If humans significantly changing their activities, there is really no harm to any of those 3 scenarios. Why not move away from carbon based energy? We have the technological knowledge to support our energy needs with wind, solar, and tidal power. We can stop fracking, drilling and spilling, and blowing off the tops of mountains. Even if there is no global warming changes, what would be the argument to not do this? I haven't gotten a good response to the downside of changing these activities. We can deforest, drill through the bottom of the oceans, and pave the world, but why would we not want to try to mitigate these activities? Look... I sort of understand if you are a CEO of a large petroleum company not wanting to make these changes. But most of us that don't have skin in that game should be on board with going to cleaner low carbon producing energy sources.
User avatar
The O
 
Posts: 2436
Joined: 06 Dec 2008, 01:52
Location: Chicago
Class: Star Ambassador
Standard rating: (953)
All-game rating: (885)
Timezone: GMT-6

Re: Climate Change

Postby beowulf7 » 27 Aug 2019, 12:11

Giggling!
User avatar
beowulf7
 
Posts: 2431
Joined: 07 Jan 2009, 17:55
Location: Kent, UK
Class: Diplomat
Standard rating: (962)
All-game rating: (963)
Timezone: GMT

Re: Climate Change

Postby Strategus » 27 Aug 2019, 23:18

I think Trump needs to nuke the Amazon. That will stop them deforesting it.
The Devil makes work for idle forces

Better to have fought and lost, than never to have fought at all
Actual Platinum Classicist
I did WDC 2017

Just say "NO!" To carebears and kittens
User avatar
Strategus
 
Posts: 1861
Joined: 30 May 2015, 14:30
Location: England
Class: Star Ambassador
Standard rating: 1583
All-game rating: 1708
Timezone: GMT

PreviousNext

Return to Debates

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 1 guest