Zoomzip wrote:Keirador wrote:For instance, a core assumption of wagonomics is that scum don't like to cluster together on the same wagon. This assumption is used to perform some scumhunting, even though there's no particular reason to believe the assumption itself is, generally speaking, true.
We can talk more about this later but... That's not, exactly, how it all works. You do consider distributions, but as a believer in wagonomics, I am challenging SJG in his ideas of a non-cluster right now. I don't think that 1-1 should inherently be preferred to a 2-0 wagon, or preferred enough to make a decision on.
Sometimes the questions are more "Could this wagon be all town? Could there be at least one scum on it? Maybe more?" Distros are useful, but saying "1-1 is a general rule of thumb" is, I think, too simplistic.
Well I think you're misunderstanding me here.
I'm not saying it's a cast-iron 1-1 situation, it never is with wagonomics.
What I AM saying is that when a wagon appears on a townie, there's normally a scum voting on it somehow somewhere. So if condude is town on Day One... the most likely scenario is that there's a scum voting for him. It's not cast-iron. It's not even close. But it IS a legitimately indicative point against Telleo over everyone who is not named Keirador.
Particularly when combined with the Day Two voting data and the potential bussers... yeah the voting data is pointing at Keirador/Telleo. It's not cast-iron, unstoppable certainty. But it is a very legitimate point pointing in the direction of K/Telleo. And it's a point which bears a reasonable amount of weight.
One of the people in charge of the Mafia forum.
Telleo wrote:The mafia forum, to them,
Sir SJG's known as a gem,
He writes a good game,
and runs it the same,
Oh what a perfect GM!
Come on Arsenal!