sjg11 wrote:Parabellum wrote:nanooktheeskimo wrote:Ok, so I'm reasonably to moderately sure of parabellum as town. I asked the GM if the win conditions were based on a running tally or if they were only counted at end of day/night, and he answered that it was a running tally. He answered in black though, so, ya know, beware of that I guess.
Which means that I don't think Para is scum, because if he was Iggs the game should have ended with him joining, as that would have made it 1:1.
I encourage other players to ask condude the same question. Either you get the same answer, and we can give Para and me half-clears, or you get a different answer and we can assume that the GM is full of it. Either way, useful information to have!
This is the only place I see Nanook saying that he asked condude a question.
My point is that Nanook assumed the running-tally rule would apply even when the game was mafia solitaire, which I said would be absurd. Because that didn't seem like a plausible way to run a game, I messaged Condude. I don't think Nanook ever claimed to have asked for a clarification when we challenged him on this interpretation.
1. It has been strongly hinted that multiple people asked condude questions in this area, we're agreed on that point are we not?
2. If nanook is scum, then he already knows the answer to this question. If he was given his role PM and was scum then he knows that a running tally is not being given in this case.
3. So, given condude's hint that people were asking multiple questions in this area and given that there is no motive for scum nanook to ask that question... I conclude that nanook is probably town.
1. yes
2 + 3. Scum Nanook does have motivation to convince town that the running tally applies to mafia solitaire, because if we believe him he's cleared as town. He doesn't have to believe his argument to present it.