no-rank games

What are your winning tactics? Kill them all? Discuss strategy for the classic and variant games using the classic map, or visit the sub-forums for the variant maps.
Forum rules
In addition to the general Forum Guidelines (see here: ... 30&t=15441), there are additional rules for posting in this forum.
1. When discussing strategy, reference should not be made to any active game. This section of the Forum is for general strategy discussion, not specific situations within games.
2. It follows that links, images, game name and/or number should not be added to a post if the game is active.
Posts which refer to a specific situation in an active game, or which link directly to an active game, are subject to editing or removal.

no-rank games

Postby mort » 08 Jan 2018, 20:11

Maybe this is not true, but I might have noticed it as a trend; do we possibly do better in no-rank games because we take greater risks?
And if so, would not the same attitude work in ranked games?
Posts: 17
Joined: 08 Jan 2010, 02:48
Class: Star Ambassador
Standard rating: 1254
All-game rating: 1264
Timezone: GMT-5

Re: no-rank games

Postby Strategus » 08 Jan 2018, 21:13

mort wrote:Maybe this is not true, but I might have noticed it as a trend; do we possibly do better in no-rank games because we take greater risks?
And if so, would not the same attitude work in ranked games?

I have noticed I have done better in games where I took on a surrendered position, with ratings shield. i believe you are right.
The Devil makes work for idle forces

Better to have fought and lost, than never to have fought at all
Actual Platinum Classicist
I did WDC 2017

UK f2f Champion 2019
Just say "NO!" To carebears and kittens
User avatar
Premium Member
Posts: 4144
Joined: 30 May 2015, 14:30
Location: England
Class: Star Ambassador
Standard rating: 1588
All-game rating: 1698
Timezone: GMT

Re: no-rank games

Postby Malarky » 09 Jan 2018, 01:13

And here's the problem with playing for your rating...

Of course, there may be other reasons people tend to get better results in no rank games, such as people taking risks (or playing as if it doesn't matter) because the game isn't ranked and therefore finding themselves more readily eliminated. Or perhaps there's a tendency for the better players to play ranked games more often than no rank because they believe ranked games will be better games.

Then there is the likelihood that the more consistent players, with Ambassador status, will tend to play against other consistent players by choice because these tend to be more interesting games (I'm assuming; I was heading towards Ambassador status before my heart pretty much put a lengthy ellipsis on things, so I never actually reached it :( ). Are these games more likely to be ranked?

But I think there is a greater likelihood of play in ranked games being more protective, more about survival, simply because they affect ratings. There are certainly people on the site who admit to playing to improve their ratings.

But this tendency is there in sport, too. If you follow football (association football, that is) you'll recognise that, when the better teams play each other, the games are often dull affairs. Rather than the feast of footballing excellence you'd hope for, the two teams play more conservatively, being more wary of the strength of the opposition. Commentators like to call it 'respect', occasionally 'too much respect', but it's really being frightened of what the other team could do to you. So, rather than expressing themselves, they play to prevent the opposition expressing themselves.

Boxing can be similar. With some notable exceptions - Hagler v Hearns, for example - when two good boxers meet, the fight can take some time to get going. Each knows what the other is capable of so they aim to preserve themselves until they see how things are likely to go. However, in boxing, even in what looks like an equal contest, occasionally one fighter will sense the other is 'off' somehow and look to grasp an early, confidence-sapping advantage.

I do think, though, that if more people went into any game of Dip with the attitude that it's a one-off game, regardless of whether it is ranked or not, that games would be more dynamic. Play to win, don't play to improve your rating; the latter doesn't exclude the former.
Respect neither opinions nor beliefs; only respect the person and the right to express them.
Play by the rules but be ferocious.
The Playdiplomacy Guide
Across the Whole Board
User avatar
Premium Member
Posts: 331
Joined: 20 Feb 2017, 09:27
Location: Yorkshire
Class: Diplomat
Standard rating: (918)
All-game rating: (1029)
Timezone: GMT

Return to Diplomacy Strategy

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests