Etiquette Question

What are your winning tactics? Kill them all? Discuss strategy for the classic and variant games using the classic map, or visit the sub-forums for the variant maps.
Forum rules
Strategy
In addition to the general Forum Guidelines (see here: http://www.playdiplomacy.com/forum/view ... 30&t=15441), there are additional rules for posting in this forum.
1. When discussing strategy, reference should not be made to any active game. This section of the Forum is for general strategy discussion, not specific situations within games.
2. It follows that links, images, game name and/or number should not be added to a post if the game is active.
Posts which refer to a specific situation in an active game, or which link directly to an active game, are subject to editing or removal.

Re: Etiquette Question

Postby Eleusinian » 23 Apr 2017, 20:27

We could go back and forth with this until the cows come home. :)

tl;dr: People who don't reply to messages in a game that is about, and literally named, Diplomacy, are in my opinion depriving me of the one and only thing that differentiates this game from any other. I personally consider that rude, but of course it's a subjective question.

You are free to define "fun" however you like, and I wasn't trying to define it for you. :) I was merely pointing out that it's inherent but important part of being a game, and that focusing exclusively on the strategic (ie, "I want to win") aspects of the game is to exclude an important aspect of it.
Eleusinian
 
Posts: 109
Joined: 27 Mar 2016, 21:38
Class: Ambassador
Standard rating: (984)
All-game rating: (981)
Timezone: GMT

Re: Etiquette Question

Postby Mr.E » 24 Apr 2017, 08:39

I don't disagree that fun is an important part of playing any game. I'd go as far as to quote what many gambling businesses say in the UK: "When it stops being fun, stop." Except that encourages quitters to quit mid-game which I think is a breach of etiquette.

I wasn't specifically saying you were trying to define fun for me or anyone other than yourself, really, I was trying to be more general. A generalised code of practice - which is what I see etiquette as being in a social game - needs to be as objective as possible, IMO.

I think it's true to say that one of the biggest challenges a diplomat faces in the real world is what to do when another diplomat cuts off communication. The solution is often to go through intermediaries, to find alternative channels or, I suppose, alternative methods. Not easy and probably more difficult in the game.

Which is why I'm taking a point of view here which isn't necessarily reflective or my practice!
Respect neither opinions nor beliefs; only respect the person and the right to express them.
Play by the rules but be ferocious.
User avatar
Mr.E
Premium Member
 
Posts: 201
Joined: 20 Feb 2017, 09:27
Location: Yorkshire
Class: Diplomat
Standard rating: 966
All-game rating: 1134
Timezone: GMT

Re: Etiquette Question

Postby Eleusinian » 24 Apr 2017, 16:09

Nibbler wrote:I wasn't specifically saying you were trying to define fun for me or anyone other than yourself, really, I was trying to be more general. A generalised code of practice - which is what I see etiquette as being in a social game - needs to be as objective as possible, IMO.


Perhaps this is the main point of contention. I see etiquette as something to be reached by consensus, not an objective truth. Well, to each their own!
Eleusinian
 
Posts: 109
Joined: 27 Mar 2016, 21:38
Class: Ambassador
Standard rating: (984)
All-game rating: (981)
Timezone: GMT

Re: Etiquette Question

Postby Mr.E » 25 Apr 2017, 08:46

Perhaps that's the way it ought to be but not the way it becomes. As soon as a majority starts saying this is what should be done it soon becomes this is how to behave and the squidgy consensus becomes hardened.

Like a piece of bread. Nice when fresh but easily hardened when left around too long and becomes stale.
Respect neither opinions nor beliefs; only respect the person and the right to express them.
Play by the rules but be ferocious.
User avatar
Mr.E
Premium Member
 
Posts: 201
Joined: 20 Feb 2017, 09:27
Location: Yorkshire
Class: Diplomat
Standard rating: 966
All-game rating: 1134
Timezone: GMT

Re: Etiquette Question

Postby Parabellum » 28 May 2017, 07:16

I'm brand new to the game, and I'm going to be honest; I had no idea credibility played a part. I assumed everyone knew everyone lied in this game; is that not true?
The thought of you has upheld me through all I have endured today, and shall, through fifty times such trouble. Give me your hand. My heart is linked to yours... What, if I am steeped in poverty? You lighten it, and we will be poor together.
User avatar
Parabellum
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: 25 May 2017, 18:46
Class: Star Ambassador
Standard rating: (969)
All-game rating: (956)
Timezone: GMT-5

Re: Etiquette Question

Postby WHSeward » 28 May 2017, 07:38

No, that is not true. Try reading this.
"As a general truth, communities prosper and flourish, or droop and decline, in just the degree that they practice or neglect to practice the primary duties of justice and humanity." WHS

A member of the Classicists.

Ask me about mentor games. Send me a PM or post in the Mentoring forum.
User avatar
WHSeward
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2935
Joined: 29 Dec 2012, 22:16
Location: San Francisco, California, USA
Class: Star Ambassador
Standard rating: (1633)
All-game rating: (1647)
Timezone: GMT-8

Re: Etiquette Question

Postby Parabellum » 28 May 2017, 10:09

Thanks for the response. This changes the way I think about the game.
The thought of you has upheld me through all I have endured today, and shall, through fifty times such trouble. Give me your hand. My heart is linked to yours... What, if I am steeped in poverty? You lighten it, and we will be poor together.
User avatar
Parabellum
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: 25 May 2017, 18:46
Class: Star Ambassador
Standard rating: (969)
All-game rating: (956)
Timezone: GMT-5

Previous

Return to Diplomacy Strategy

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron