Aurelia1 wrote:Jack007 wrote:It's not Diplomacy, it's beautiful Risk or whatever name you wanna give the game.
It’s still Diplomacy. The negotiations and fun stuff may have died down, but that happens at some point in almost every game.
NoPunIn10Did wrote:Aurelia1 wrote:Jack007 wrote:It's not Diplomacy, it's beautiful Risk or whatever name you wanna give the game.
It’s still Diplomacy. The negotiations and fun stuff may have died down, but that happens at some point in almost every game.
Also, playing a shorter game for highest center count was part of the official rules for decades.
http://www.diplomacy-archive.com/diplomacy_rules.htm
It’s explicitly provided for in every edition of the game from 1961-1992.
nanooktheeskimo wrote:If you don’t like the event—that’s fine and your prerogative. I would suggest that this probably isn’t the place to be deriding an event that a lot of us went to and had fun at. This isn’t the thread to argue if WDC is “legit” or not or whatever. You’re welcome to open that discussion in another thread, but please respect the people who put a ton of time into organizing this and then went out of their way to provide playdip updates, and the people who attended and (hopefully!) enjoyed the event, by not polluting this thread with cries of “there’s only one true diplomacy and this isn’t it!”
You’re more than welcome to open that discussion in another thread, but I’d suggest you respect the people in this thread by not trying to have that argument here.
DQ wrote:Its pretty clear that "respect for other people" isn't something Jack believes in. ...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest