Forum game Diplomacy league

Information and rules for Play-by-Forum game tournaments go here.

Moderator: Morg

Re: Forum game Diplomacy league

Postby mat.gopack » 21 Jan 2011, 00:39

well, I think the leaderboard would kinda be an incentive to play. How about having Wins and Draws to start off? The problem is factoring the size of the game in...
.·ï¨Ï¨Ï¨ï·.mat.gopack.·ï¨Ï¨Ï¨ï·.
Mattopia of the Mattibean Union in CYOC. You should join ;)

"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake"

Spreadsheets are fun!
User avatar
mat.gopack
 
Posts: 20718
Joined: 22 Nov 2009, 23:40
Location: The Carolinas
Class: Diplomat
Standard rating: (929)
All-game rating: (929)
Timezone: GMT-5

Re: Forum game Diplomacy league

Postby sjg11 » 21 Jan 2011, 21:14

mat.gopack wrote:well, I think the leaderboard would kinda be an incentive to play. How about having Wins and Draws to start off? The problem is factoring the size of the game in...

I think we could use this as the amount of points every game.
For example
Solo-12
2 Way Draw-6
3 Way Draw-4
4 Way Draw-3
5 Way Draw-2

Then we multiply the pointss by the number of players in the game
For example if you solo in a game with seven players you get 12x7=84 points
One of the people in charge of the Mafia forum.
Telleo wrote:The mafia forum, to them,
Sir SJG's known as a gem,
He writes a good game,
and runs it the same,
Oh what a perfect GM!

Come on Arsenal!
User avatar
sjg11
 
Posts: 17046
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 15:30
Class: Diplomat
Standard rating: (908)
All-game rating: (899)
Timezone: GMT

Re: Forum game Diplomacy league

Postby Waterice man » 22 Jan 2011, 00:38

I think it would be better to multiply by the square root of the number of players. Whilst this does tend to complicate the mathematics, it doesn't make the smaller games completely irrelevant as just multiplying by the number of players does.
Why did the chicken cross the Möbius strip?

The word 'surrender' derives from old French
User avatar
Waterice man
 
Posts: 4677
Joined: 31 Dec 2008, 18:36
Location: Britain. Chances are, you used to be in our empire
Class: Diplomat
All-game rating: (1000)
Timezone: GMT

Re: Forum game Diplomacy league

Postby sjg11 » 22 Jan 2011, 08:41

Waterice man wrote:I think it would be better to multiply by the square root of the number of players. Whilst this does tend to complicate the mathematics, it doesn't make the smaller games completely irrelevant as just multiplying by the number of players does.

True and complicated mathematics isn't quite so complicated with a calculator.
One of the people in charge of the Mafia forum.
Telleo wrote:The mafia forum, to them,
Sir SJG's known as a gem,
He writes a good game,
and runs it the same,
Oh what a perfect GM!

Come on Arsenal!
User avatar
sjg11
 
Posts: 17046
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 15:30
Class: Diplomat
Standard rating: (908)
All-game rating: (899)
Timezone: GMT

Re: Forum game Diplomacy league

Postby Pedros » 23 Jan 2011, 22:12

I definitely favour Ceebs suggestion of the ELO-based system in DiplomaticCorp. It's complicated, true, but it seems to me to meet all the objections to the present main site ranking systgem - that it encourages draws, takes no account of the abilities of the people you beat/lose to, etc, and also deals well with the varied number of games.

I'd be totally opposed to the suggestion that we multiply base points by the number of players in the game. That would totally unbalance the system in favour of large games, even if no solo is gained.
"Sooner or later, one of us will stab the other. But for now we're both better off as allies" (kininvie)
User avatar
Pedros
 
Posts: 12465
Joined: 25 Jan 2009, 12:59
Location: Somewhere full of gorse and brambles, West Cornwall
Class: Star Ambassador
Standard rating: (1085)
All-game rating: (1314)
Timezone: GMT

Re: Forum game Diplomacy league

Postby Pedros » 23 Jan 2011, 22:14

cs wrote:Should we opt for a league, I'm willing to captain a team. (I've captained tourney teams, so it's nothing new, and I'm sure I can recruit two other reliable players.)

I'd suggest we just start sign-ups for teams. If we get a sufficient number of teams (that look reliable in quality, which I would say means having at least one person who has participated reliably in forum games in the past), we start. If not, we can implement rankings.

Not so fast cs! The overwhelming sense in this discussion so far is against a league and teams!
"Sooner or later, one of us will stab the other. But for now we're both better off as allies" (kininvie)
User avatar
Pedros
 
Posts: 12465
Joined: 25 Jan 2009, 12:59
Location: Somewhere full of gorse and brambles, West Cornwall
Class: Star Ambassador
Standard rating: (1085)
All-game rating: (1314)
Timezone: GMT

Re: Forum game Diplomacy league

Postby sjg11 » 24 Jan 2011, 22:51

Pedros wrote:
cs wrote:Should we opt for a league, I'm willing to captain a team. (I've captained tourney teams, so it's nothing new, and I'm sure I can recruit two other reliable players.)

I'd suggest we just start sign-ups for teams. If we get a sufficient number of teams (that look reliable in quality, which I would say means having at least one person who has participated reliably in forum games in the past), we start. If not, we can implement rankings.

Not so fast cs! The overwhelming sense in this discussion so far is against a league and teams!

I had a good idea today. How about we try a knockout tournament. Or maybe have mini leagues and then have x number of players go through to a final. Just something I thought I'd throw out there.
One of the people in charge of the Mafia forum.
Telleo wrote:The mafia forum, to them,
Sir SJG's known as a gem,
He writes a good game,
and runs it the same,
Oh what a perfect GM!

Come on Arsenal!
User avatar
sjg11
 
Posts: 17046
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 15:30
Class: Diplomat
Standard rating: (908)
All-game rating: (899)
Timezone: GMT

Re: Forum game Diplomacy league

Postby mat.gopack » 25 Jan 2011, 00:15

well, I'd love a league, but it needs support. How about we start with the rankings, maintain them for a month. In a month, we can have the top X players do a tournament.
or the top X players could all form a team, and have a draft for any other interested person.
Just a thought, but it could merge the two ideas nicely
.·ï¨Ï¨Ï¨ï·.mat.gopack.·ï¨Ï¨Ï¨ï·.
Mattopia of the Mattibean Union in CYOC. You should join ;)

"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake"

Spreadsheets are fun!
User avatar
mat.gopack
 
Posts: 20718
Joined: 22 Nov 2009, 23:40
Location: The Carolinas
Class: Diplomat
Standard rating: (929)
All-game rating: (929)
Timezone: GMT-5

Re: Forum game Diplomacy league

Postby cs » 25 Jan 2011, 03:57

Pedros wrote:
cs wrote:Should we opt for a league, I'm willing to captain a team. (I've captained tourney teams, so it's nothing new, and I'm sure I can recruit two other reliable players.)

I'd suggest we just start sign-ups for teams. If we get a sufficient number of teams (that look reliable in quality, which I would say means having at least one person who has participated reliably in forum games in the past), we start. If not, we can implement rankings.

Not so fast cs! The overwhelming sense in this discussion so far is against a league and teams!


Well, there's no reason not to do both. And I figured I'd put it out there and see what happened. If there's no interest, there's no interest.
User avatar
cs
 
Posts: 1003
Joined: 24 Apr 2009, 23:24
Location: Venice, but moving to Trieste in 1901
Class: Diplomat
All-game rating: (1000)
Timezone: GMT-5

Re: Forum game Diplomacy league

Postby cs » 25 Jan 2011, 04:03

Pedros wrote:I definitely favour Ceebs suggestion of the ELO-based system in DiplomaticCorp. It's complicated, true, but it seems to me to meet all the objections to the present main site ranking systgem - that it encourages draws, takes no account of the abilities of the people you beat/lose to, etc, and also deals well with the varied number of games.

I'd be totally opposed to the suggestion that we multiply base points by the number of players in the game. That would totally unbalance the system in favour of large games, even if no solo is gained.


Your comment about the main site ranking system failing to take into account who one plays against is a very good one. The other problem I have is that it takes no account of which power you play--it's absurd that solo as Russia is worth just as much as a solo as Austria, given the latter is much more difficult to accomplish. I don't think we could really factor that into the forum games, as there's not enough of a database to even start to assess whether, say, France or China is the easier country in Imperial (though Turkey is, without dispute, the most difficult by a long margin and requires the most skilled, experienced, persuasive, and good-looking of players to manage even a share of a draw).
User avatar
cs
 
Posts: 1003
Joined: 24 Apr 2009, 23:24
Location: Venice, but moving to Trieste in 1901
Class: Diplomat
All-game rating: (1000)
Timezone: GMT-5

PreviousNext

Return to PbF Tournaments

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest